The Department of State Services (DSS) has urged the Federal High Court, Abuja, to restrain Prof Patrick Utomi from further making public comments or engaging in rallies related to the subject of a suit pending against him over his announced plan to establish a shadow government in the country.
The request is contained in a fresh application filed before the court by the organisation, following reports that Utomi, who is reportedly currently abroad, has planned protests, road shows, media interviews, and related activities, after his return to the country on June 6, 2025.
The application seeks mainly: “an order of interlocutory injunction, restraining the defendant/respondent (Utomi), his agents, privies, associates, servants, workers or any person acting through him from staging road shows, rallies, public lectures or any form of public gathering, newspaper publications, television programs, jingles or any other public enlightenment programme (s) aimed at sensitizing, instigating, propagating or in any way promoting the purported “shadow government/shadow cabinet” or its objectives or goals with the view to establishing the said “shadow government” pending the hearing and determination of this substantive suit.”
The grounds for the application, according to the DSS’ legal team, led by Akinlolu Kehinde (SAN), include that, if not restrained, Utomi’s proposed rallies, road shows and actions would “constitute a serious threat to public order, safety, and national unity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The DSS added that since it is statutorily empowered to safeguard the internal security of the country and prevent any threats to the lawful authority of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and its constituent institutions, it was its responsibility to forestall any threat to public order, safety, and national unity.
It stated that before it filed the substantive suit, Utomi had, through public statements, social media, and other platforms, engaged in statements and actions aimed at undermining the outcome of the case now pending before the court, and which he is aware of.
The DSS said it gathered through monitoring and intelligence reports that Utomi, who is currently abroad and is due to return on June 6 plans “to stage road shows and rallies under the guise of freedom of speech and association in a bid to cause public discontent in furtherance of his establishment of the purported ‘shadow government/shadow cabinet.’
In a supporting affidavit, the DSS adds that Utomi’s intention “is to stage road shows and rallies that are capable of drawing a large number of Nigerians with the intent that will cause huge disruption of peace, breakdown of public order, enable riots and violent protests just as the recent “End SARS” protests in 2020.
“All the planned protests, riots, and agitations that will ensue, if the purported actions of the defendant/respondent are not stayed, may lead to mayhem with a potential for anarchy, loss of lives, and property.
“The proposed allies, road shows and actions of the Defendant/Respondent constitute a serious threat to the public order, safety and national unity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”
The DSS stated that on May 26, during the fourth edition of the Topaz Lecture Series, themed “Shadow Government: A Distraction or Necessity”, hosted by the University of Lagos (UNILAG) Mass Communication Class of 1988 Alumni Association, Utomi made statements, capable of undermining the pending suit.
It added that in the statements, widely publicized by various national newspapers and on social media platforms, Utomi defended the creation of the purported shadow government and further stated that if the suit succeeds in favour of the DSS, himself and his group shall adopt a different name.
The SSS added that Utomi “has been served with the originating process in this suit and has entered appearance vide his Counsel Professor Mike Ozekhome (SAN) since May 20, 2025.
“The defendant/respondent (Utomi) is aware of the pendency of this action before this Honourable Court as he has been served with the originating process in this suit by courier as ordered by this Honourable Court.
“Unless this honourable court intervenes by granting this application, the defendant/respondent’s acts may foist a fait accompli on the court.
The SSS adds that It was in the interest of justice, national security, and the rule of law for this honourable court to grant the application.
